Tag: Dowsing

Accurate Intuitive Discernment Made Easy Part 2

by on Aug.31, 2009, under Dowsing, Most Recent Blog Post

If you have not yet read part 1 of this article then you need to before you will understand what this data means and how I arrived at it. The percentages listed next to the names of these Project Camelot witnesses represents the actual factual accuracy of their statements.

These numbers in no way represent what percentage of the information given in these Camelot Interviews that the interviewee believed is true. The source I used for this information was my higher self, and the method used for the information retrieval was pendulum dowsing.

This is my personal intuitive take on this.  I have specifically posted the methods for how to dowse these up yourself in part one so that I am not holding the keys to the kingdom so to speak.  You can acess these interviews by going to www.projectcamelot.org.

Percentage of Actual Factual Accuracy of Project Camelot Interviewees

(percentages do not represent honesty of these individuals)

Benjamin Fulford 23%

Dr. Bill Deagle 33%

Bill Hamilton 11%

Bill Holden 32%

Bob Dean 88%

Boriska 12%

Dr. Brian O’Leary 84%

Sgt. Clifford Stone 52%

Dan Burisch 33%

Dan Sherman 23%

David Corso 44%

David Icke 43%

David Wilcock 86%

Duncan O’Finioan 84%

Elizabeth Nelson 44%

Erick Von Daniken 44%

Gary McKinnon 22%

George Green 33%

Gordon Novel 23%

Henry Deacon (Arthur Neuman) 22%

Jake Simpson43%

Jim Humble 43%

Jim Mars 44%

Jim Sparks 23%

John Lear 21%

Joseph Farrell 11%

Leo Zagami 2%

Luca Scantamburlo 22%

Marcia Schafer 85%

Miriam Delicado 65%

Mr. X 43%

Peter Lavenda 21%

Ralph Ring 11%

Ricardo Silva 22%

Richard Hoagland 72%

Steven Greer 92%

Crystal Skull (Bill Homann) 23%

Valery Uvarov 11%

Wade Frazier 11%

Pete Peterson 32%

I realize that the Pete Peterson interview is not even published yet. Therefore, what I dowsed was the total accuracy of all of the things that he told to the people present during his interview. These people would be David Wilcock, Dr. Burham, Kerry Cassidy, and Bill Ryan.

My conclusions after dowsing up this data is that I am surprised. I thought that there would have been more people with higher numbers of accuracy to their statements. There may be a few bad apples in this bunch. However, I think that most of these people are under the impression that their information is factually accurate.

It seems as though there are only a handful of these witnesses and researchers that actually have a true grasp of what is going on. These individuals are Bob Dean, Dr. Brian O’Leary, David Wilcock, Duncan O’Finioan, Marcia Shafer, Miriam Delicado, Steven Greer and Richard Hoagland. The one that blows me away the most would be Duncan O’Finioan, holy crap! If you have not yet listened to Duncan’s interview with Camelot you should.

4 Comments :, , , , , , , , more...

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!